Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Hoai Dang v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al

  1. February 28, 2017

    9th Circ. Won't Rethink Samsung In-Box Arbitration Suits

    The Ninth Circuit on Monday declined to reconsider its decisions rejecting Samsung's arbitration bids in two proposed class actions based on a provision in an in-box warranty brochure, leaving intact rulings the tech giant had said flouted precedent.

  2. February 03, 2017

    Samsung Asks 9th Circ. To Rethink In-Box Arbitration Suits

    Samsung asked the Ninth Circuit on Thursday to reconsider its decisions declining its arbitration bid in putative class actions based off of a provision in an in-box warranty brochure, saying the court's decision doesn't follow previous precedent.

  3. January 19, 2017

    Samsung Loses In-Box Arbitration Clause Bids At 9th Circ.

    Samsung cell phone buyers saw victories in two separate class actions in the Ninth Circuit on Thursday when a panel denied the tech giant's bid to arbitrate claims based off a provision in an in-box warranty brochure, saying the consumers hadn't given consent under California law.

  4. October 17, 2016

    Samsung Buyers Allege 'Stealth Contracting' At 9th Circ.

    A Ninth Circuit panel heard back-to-back oral arguments Monday in two class actions that Samsung wants to send to arbitration, with consumers arguing that Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.'s arbitration clause is "stealth contracting" tucked into a product warranty that isn't available to customers until after they've bought their cellphones.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!