Fitbit, Inc. v. AliphCom et al

  1. December 14, 2017

    Fitbit, Jawbone Announce Deal To End Sprawling IP War

    Rival wearable fitness device makers Fitbit Inc. and Jawbone told a California federal judge Thursday that they'd reached a settlement agreement resolving their multifront intellectual property war, requesting and subsequently receiving dismissal of a patent infringement suit Fitbit had brought against its competitor.

  2. October 12, 2017

    Jawbone's Claims In Fitbit IP Suit Hamper Atty Withdrawal

    A California federal judge on Thursday again declined to rule on a bid by attorneys to withdraw from representing Jawbone in Fitbit Inc.'s patent infringement suit against the rival wearable fitness device maker, saying "it would be helpful" if Jawbone dropped its counterclaims against Fitbit before he rules.

  3. September 21, 2017

    Attys Can't Yet Dump Client Jawbone In Fitbit IP Suit

    A California federal judge declined to rule on Thursday on a bid by attorneys to withdraw from representing Jawbone in Fitbit Inc.'s patent infringement suit against the rival wearable fitness device maker, expressing concerns that if he grants the unopposed request, Jawbone will be unrepresented, which could disrupt the litigation.

  4. August 22, 2017

    Jawbone's Successor Must Share Docs With Fitbit: Judge

    A California magistrate judge on Tuesday ordered a company that recently acquired Jawbone's assets to produce documents in Fitbit Inc.'s patent infringement suit against the rival wearable fitness device maker, saying the new company is obviously intimately involved in Jawbone's business and is "just not a third party who's out there."

  5. July 21, 2017

    Fitbit Sways Judge On Infringement Changes In Jawbone Row

    A California magistrate judge on Friday changed her mind and allowed Fitbit Inc. to amend its patent infringement contentions against rival Jawbone, finding that the wearable fitness device company has a good reason for the changes and it’s been diligent in pursuing them.

  6. July 18, 2017

    Fitbit Asks To Tweak Infringement Theory In Jawbone Row

    Fitbit Inc. urged a California magistrate judge Tuesday to change her mind and allow the wearable fitness device company to amend its patent infringement contentions against rival Jawbone, saying it needs to modify its infringement theory as a direct result of the court's claim construction.

  7. March 10, 2017

    Susman Attys Seek To Drop Jawbone In Fitbit IP Row

    A team of seven Susman Godfrey LLP attorneys seek to step away from representing Jawbone in a patent infringement suit brought by Fitbit Inc. citing "professional considerations," according to a motion to withdraw in California federal court on Friday.

  8. February 10, 2017

    Jawbone Can't Invalidate Three Fitbit Patents, Judge Rules

    A California federal judge rejected on Thursday a bid by wearable technology maker Jawbone to invalidate three of Fitbit's wearable fitness tracker patents at the heart of Fitbit's infringement lawsuit against the rival device maker, ruling that the patents are sufficiently inventive to be patented and not invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling.

  9. September 14, 2016

    Fitbit Fights Jawbone's Bid To Invalidate Patents

    Fitbit Inc. on Wednesday asked a California court to reject rival fitness tracker maker Jawbone's claims that the patents Fitbit has accused Jawbone of infringing are invalid.

  10. August 09, 2016

    Fitbit Wants Jawbone To Pay Legal Bill In Aborted IP Motion

    Activity tracker maker Fitbit Inc. asked a California federal court to make Jawbone cover the nearly $50,000 in bills it incurred fighting a push for a noninfringement judgment in their patent dispute, saying its rival should face the consequences of filing a "frivolous" motion.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!