ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. R&Q REINSURANCE COMPANY

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

2:15-cv-05528

Court:

Pennsylvania Eastern

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Judge:

HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY

Firms

  1. June 03, 2016

    Pa. Asbestos Coverage Suit Axed In Favor Of Illinois Case

    A Pennsylvania federal judge on Thursday dismissed an $8 million asbestos coverage lawsuit filed by a Travelers Insurance subsidiary against R&Q Reinsurance Co. on the grounds that a parallel lawsuit brought by R&Q in Illinois federal court was filed first.

  2. January 20, 2016

    Reinsurer Fights To Keep $8M Asbestos Coverage Row In Ill.

    R&Q Reinsurance told a Pennsylvania federal judge Wednesday there's no reason not to dismiss a suit brought by a Traveler's subsidiary over coverage for $8 million in asbestos claim payouts in favor of a suit the reinsurer filed in Illinois a month before.

  3. January 13, 2016

    Travelers Unit Wants $8M Asbestos Reinsurance Fight In Pa.

    A Travelers subsidiary urged a Pennsylvania federal judge Wednesday to deny R&Q Reinsurance's bid to dismiss a suit over coverage for $8 million in asbestos claim payouts, arguing that R&Q is trying to gain an unfair advantage by pressing a parallel case in Illinois.

  4. October 08, 2015

    Travelers Unit Sues Reinsurer For $8M In Asbestos Coverage

    A Travelers subsidiary sued R&Q Reinsurance in Pennsylvania federal court Wednesday, claiming it owes the insurer more than $8 million on asbestos claim payouts under two 1980s policies the reinsurer agreed to cover in part.