Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Cheatham v. ADT Corporation et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-02137
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Personal Property: Property Damage Product Liability
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 11, 2017
ADT Says No Common Class In Alarm Hackability Suit
Home security company ADT on Tuesday resisted an Arizona consumer's bid to certify a proposed class of device owners supposedly deceived about their efficiency and vulnerability to hacking, telling a federal judge that warnings were provided in a variety of ways, making the claims highly individualized.
-
December 15, 2016
Ariz. ADT Alarm Owners Want Hackability Suit Class Certified
Consumers accusing ADT LLC of falsely advertising the efficiency of its wireless home alarm systems and hiding from them certain vulnerabilities told an Arizona federal judge Wednesday that their claims were appropriate for resolution on a statewide class basis and urged certification.