Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
DICKON v. RUBIN & ROTHMAN, LLC et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-07961
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
April 05, 2016
Rubin & Rothman Wins Reversal Of Default In Debt Suit
A New Jersey federal judge agreed Tuesday to set aside an entry of default in a suit against Rubin & Rothman LLP over its allegedly illegal debt collection practices on behalf of Toyota's auto lending arm, but denied the law firm's attempt to have the suit dismissed.
-
November 09, 2015
Rubin & Rothman Unlawfully Collecting Debts, Suit Claims
A New Jersey man hit debt collection law firm Rubin & Rothman LLP with a proposed class action in New Jersey federal court Monday, alleging the firm violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act by misleading him into believing it was aggressively pursuing a debt collection for which he owed additional fees.