July 21, 2016
Protostorm said on Thursday it intends to appeal to the Fourth Circuit a federal judge's ruling that a Virginia law firm's malpractice insurance policy for $5 million, not $10 million, applies to a verdict for botching a client's online game patent.
June 23, 2016
A Virginia law firm's malpractice insurance policy for $5 million, not $10 million, applies to a verdict for botching a client's online game patent, a federal judge ruled Wednesday, leaving the firm responsible for a larger share of the $8 million award.
April 18, 2016
Minnesota Lawyers Mutual Insurance Co. told a Virginia federal court Friday it doesn't have to cover all of an $8 million jury verdict against Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP for botching a client's patent application, saying a policy limit applies.
April 11, 2016
Protostorm LLC and Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP, the firm hit by a jury with an $8 million judgment for botching Protostorm's patent application, each asked a Virginia federal judge Friday to deny a bid by the firm's malpractice insurer to partially escape coverage, saying the insurer mischaracterizes when the claims arose.
April 01, 2016
Protostorm LLC urged a Virginia federal judge Friday to rule that the malpractice insurer for Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP must pay the entire $8 million judgment a jury leveled against the firm for a botched patent application, contending that the policy provides for up to $10 million in coverage.
March 28, 2016
The malpractice insurer for Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP asked a Virginia federal judge Friday for a quick decision that it owes only a portion of the $8 million judgment a jury leveled against the firm for a botched patent application because the errors occurred before its policy was in place.
March 03, 2016
A former patent client of Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus on Wednesday urged a Virginia federal court to reject a bid for limited discovery by the firm's malpractice insurer, which is looking to limit its responsibility for an $8 million judgment against Antonelli, arguing nothing in the case supports the move.
November 10, 2015
A malpractice insurance provider on Monday asked a Virginia federal court to declare that it is only responsible for $5 million of the $8 million judgment awarded to an ex-client of Antonelli Terry Stout & Kraus LLP over an allegedly botched patent application.