Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Allen Wiseley, et al v. Amazon.com, Inc.
Case Number:
15-56799
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 20, 2017
9th Circ. Upholds Amazon's Win In List-Price Class Action
A Ninth Circuit panel Tuesday affirmed a lower court's use of Washington law when it dismissed an Amazon shopper's putative class action over alleged inflation of comparative discounts, rejecting the shopper's argument that California law is substantially different.
-
August 30, 2017
Amazon User Asks 9th Circ. To Revive List-Price Class Action
A California Amazon shopper urged the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday to revive his putative class action alleging the internet retailer inflates its comparative discounts, saying a lower court wrongly used Washington law to find Amazon.com's arbitration provision valid instead of using California's more consumer-friendly legal standard.
-
June 15, 2016
Amazon Shopper Tells 9th Circ. Arbitration Provision Invalid
A proposed class accusing Amazon of falsely inflating its comparative discounts urged the Ninth Circuit on Tuesday to reverse a lower court's decision to dismiss the suit over an arbitration agreement, arguing the relevant clause is non-negotiable for shoppers and unconscionable.
-
May 02, 2016
Amazon Says Shopper Can't Skirt Airtight Arbitration Clause
Amazon.com Inc. told the Ninth Circuit on Friday that a district court was perfectly reasonable to rely on a purchase agreement's valid and accepted arbitration clause to force a shopper's class complaint over allegedly inflated comparative pricing into arbitration.
-
March 02, 2016
9th Circ. Asked To Block Arbitration In Amazon Pricing Suit
Consumers claiming Amazon inflates the competing prices of its products to make discounts seem heftier have urged the Ninth Circuit to revive their proposed class action, arguing the district court applied the wrong state's laws when determining it belongs in arbitration.