Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Luv N' Care, Ltd. et al v. Goldberg Cohen, LLP et al

Track this case

Case Number:

1:15-cv-09248

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

P.I.: Other

Judge:

Naomi Reice Buchwald

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. November 14, 2016

    Luv N' Care Can't Reargue $10M Negligence Suit, Judge Says

    Baby product company Luv N' Care on Thursday lost out on its push for another try at a $10 million malpractice suit against Goldberg Cohen LLP, when a New York federal judge refused to reconsider a dismissal order that found Louisiana statutes of limitations barred the entire action.

  2. September 29, 2016

    Goldberg Cohen Says Malpractice Suit Bid Is A Retread

    Goldberg Cohen LLP urged a New York federal judge to deny a bid by Luv N' Care for reconsideration of a decision tossing a $10 million malpractice suit against the law firm over certain patent cases, saying Wednesday the baby products company wasn't offering any new information.

  3. September 16, 2016

    Luv N' Care Pleads For Do-Over In Goldberg Malpractice Suit

    Baby product company Luv N' Care asked Thursday for a do-over in a recently dismissed $10 million suit against Goldberg Cohen LLP stemming from allegedly flawed patent applications and other issues, arguing that a judge shouldn't have applied a Louisiana statute of limitations for a malpractice case targeting lawyers not admitted in that state.

  4. August 18, 2016

    NY Law Firm Dodges Luv N' Care's $10M IP Negligence Suit

    Goldberg Cohen LLP on Thursday escaped a $10 million malpractice suit by former client Luv N' Care, which accused the firm of botching underlying patent cases, when a New York federal judge ruled the company's allegations were all brought too late.

  5. August 04, 2016

    Luv N' Care Says Del. Gives It Time To Sue Goldberg Cohen

    Baby products giant Luv N' Care Ltd. pinned its hopes Thursday in its $10 million legal malpractice suit against Goldberg Cohen LLP on a New York federal judge agreeing that its patents are held by a Delaware corporation, which would help the Louisiana company get around the Pelican State's one-year statute of limitations.

  6. February 23, 2016

    Luv N' Care GC Rips Lying Allegations In Goldberg Cohen Suit

    Luv N' Care's general counsel ripped into his opposing counsel in a Tuesday filing in New York federal court, saying he has never encountered such attacks on his reputation as in the baby products company's malpractice suit against Goldberg Cohen over its representation in several patent matters.

  7. February 18, 2016

    Goldberg Cohen Says Ex-Client Lied In $10M Malpractice Suit

    Goldberg Cohen LLP told a New York federal court Wednesday that Luv N' Care fabricated a response from the firm in a bid to save the baby products company's suit seeking at least $10 million from Goldberg Cohen over its representation in several patent-related matters.

  8. January 20, 2016

    Firm Says Luv N' Care's Malpractice Suit Is Time Barred

    A malpractice suit seeking at least $10 million from Goldberg Cohen LLP and two attorneys over their representation of Luv N' Care in several patent-related matters should be tossed because the baby products giant filed it too late, the firm argued Tuesday in New York federal court.

  9. December 16, 2015

    Luv N' Care, Firm Debate Deadline For $10M Malpractice Suit

    Baby products giant Luv N' Care and the attorneys it is suing for at least $10 million in a malpractice suit over their representation in several patent-related matters filed dueling letters with a New York federal court this week, debating which is the proper deadline for it to have filed the case.

  10. November 24, 2015

    Luv N' Care Files $10M Malpractice Suit Against NY Attys

    Baby products giant Luv N' Care Ltd. sought at least $10 million from one of its former law firms Monday, saying in a federal malpractice suit that the firm's lawyers failed to take necessary steps in patent cases and failed to seek legal fees after winning a $10 million royalty judgment.