Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Sephora USA, Inc. v. Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.
Case Number:
3:15-cv-05750
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 16, 2016
Palmer Reifler Had Duty To Defend Sephora In Shoplifter Suit
A Florida law firm had a duty to defend retailer client Sephora from a lawsuit targeting its methods for pursuing damages from shoplifters, a California federal judge ruled Friday, despite the fact that the underlying case did not result in a finding of fault.
-
April 25, 2016
Sephora Says Palmer Reifler Liable For Defense Costs
Sephora on Friday told a California federal court that Palmer Reifler & Associates PA is clearly required to indemnify it under a service agreement, pushing back against claims by the firm that it has no liability to the cosmetic retailer related to its defense of how it pursues shoplifting damages.
-
April 11, 2016
Palmer Reifler Says It Has No Liability For Sephora's Defense
Palmer Reifler & Associates PA told a California federal court Friday that it has "no possible liability" to Sephora for costs related to a dismissed customer suit over the cosmetics retailer's pursuit of shoplifting damages, saying the firm's service agreement contains no contractual reimbursement duty.
-
December 16, 2015
Sephora Says Palmer Reifler Is Liable For Shoplifting Suit
Sephora slapped Palmer Reifler & Associates PA with a lawsuit Tuesday in California federal court demanding reimbursement for a proposed class action arising out of the firm's agreement to represent the cosmetics retailer in pursuing damages for shoplifting.