Sephora USA, Inc. v. Palmer, Reifler & Associates, P.A.

  1. May 16, 2016

    Palmer Reifler Had Duty To Defend Sephora In Shoplifter Suit

    A Florida law firm had a duty to defend retailer client Sephora from a lawsuit targeting its methods for pursuing damages from shoplifters, a California federal judge ruled Friday, despite the fact that the underlying case did not result in a finding of fault.

  2. April 25, 2016

    Sephora Says Palmer Reifler Liable For Defense Costs

    Sephora on Friday told a California federal court that Palmer Reifler & Associates PA is clearly required to indemnify it under a service agreement, pushing back against claims by the firm that it has no liability to the cosmetic retailer related to its defense of how it pursues shoplifting damages.

  3. April 11, 2016

    Palmer Reifler Says It Has No Liability For Sephora's Defense

    Palmer Reifler & Associates PA told a California federal court Friday that it has "no possible liability" to Sephora for costs related to a dismissed customer suit over the cosmetics retailer's pursuit of shoplifting damages, saying the firm's service agreement contains no contractual reimbursement duty.

  4. December 16, 2015

    Sephora Says Palmer Reifler Is Liable For Shoplifting Suit

    Sephora slapped Palmer Reifler & Associates PA with a lawsuit Tuesday in California federal court demanding reimbursement for a proposed class action arising out of the firm's agreement to represent the cosmetics retailer in pursuing damages for shoplifting.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!