Soaring Wind Energy LLC et al v. Catic USA Inc et al

  1. June 16, 2016

    $70M Arbitral Loser Just 'Blustering,' Wind Investors Say

    Investors in a wind energy joint venture have urged a Texas federal judge to confirm their $70 million arbitration award against a Chinese aerospace conglomerate for secretly competing with the JV, saying arbitration records prove the opposition's case is "more bluster than substance."

  2. April 28, 2016

    Counsel Row Resolved In $70M Wind Energy Award Suit

    An investor dispute about hiring and firing counsel that derailed a wind energy venture's pursuit of a $70 million arbitral award from a Chinese former business partner has been resolved, according to a Thursday filing in Texas federal court.

  3. April 27, 2016

    AVIC Opposes Splitting Of Issues In $70M Wind Energy Row

    A Chinese aviation company and its affiliates continued to oppose a plan by Texas wind developers to split the issues in a lawsuit to confirm a $70 million arbitration award against them, telling a Texas federal court Tuesday that the issues are interconnected.

  4. April 26, 2016

    AVIC Stalling By Refusing To Split $70M Suit, Tang Says

    Wind farm developer Tang Energy Group Ltd. hit back Monday in Texas federal court against Aviation Industry Corp. of China, saying the company and its affiliates are attempting to avoid an unfavorable ruling by fighting to keep a suit seeking to confirm a $70 million arbitration award intact.

  5. April 25, 2016

    AVIC Says Soaring Wind, Tang Can't Split $70M Award Fight

    Aviation Industry Corp. of China asked a Texas federal judge on Friday to toss a plan to bypass issues of the liability of some of its affiliates for a $70 million award in the company's bid to vacate the award, which was ordered against it for backing out of an investment agreement with a wind power developer.

  6. April 11, 2016

    Wind Energy Investors Say Counsel Spat Nearly Resolved

    Two investors in a wind turbine company whose internal disputes have halted its pursuit of a $70 million arbitral award told a Texas federal judge Monday that a solution was close and they would drop their opposition to a request to swap out counsel for Soaring Wind Energy LLC.

  7. March 24, 2016

    Judge Won't Cut Counsel Loose In Wind Investment Row

    A Texas federal judge Wednesday declined to let two law firms withdraw from representing a wind energy company attempting to confirm a $70 million arbitration award and gave the dispute-wracked company and its lawyers 60 days to get its representation in order.

  8. March 23, 2016

    Tang Energy Slams Attys' Bids To Exit Wind Power Row

    Dallas-based alternative energy services provider Tang Energy Group Ltd. asked a Texas federal judge Tuesday to block attempts by its lawyers to withdraw as counsel in the company's push to confirm a $70 million arbitration award received in a contract dispute stemming from its investment in a wind power developer.

  9. March 22, 2016

    Chinese Co. Fights $70M Arbitration Award In Wind Power Row

    Aviation Industry Corp. of China and a subsidiary urged a Texas federal court on Monday not to confirm a $70 million arbitration award issued in a contract dispute stemming from a joint investment in a wind power developer, saying the arbitration winners failed to follow filing rules in their effort to confirm the award.

  10. March 21, 2016

    Panel Lacked Authority In $70M Wind Energy Row, Court Told

    An arbitration panel that issued a $70 million award against companies affiliated with AVIC International USA Inc. on the basis of its agreement with a Texas wind farm developer engaged in misconduct by rendering judgments against non-signatories to the agreement, the companies told a Texas district court Friday.