Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Fernando Delgado et al v. FanDuel Inc et al
Case Number:
2:15-cv-09907
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 03, 2016
Panel Keeps FanDuel Deposit-Matching Scheme Suits In MDL
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Friday moved three more lawsuits over FanDuel's $200 deposit-matching program into the daily fantasy sports multidistrict litigation despite the objections of plaintiffs in two of the cases.
-
February 12, 2016
FanDuel Says Terms Demand Arbitration In False Ad Suit
FanDuel urged a California federal court on Thursday to enforce the arbitration provision of its terms of use in a proposed class action accusing the daily fantasy sports operator of making false promises about matching customer buy-ins, saying it's not the company's fault the players didn't read the terms.
-
February 05, 2016
FanDuel Arbitration Terms Called Too Hidden To Be Enforced
Daily fantasy sports players suing FanDuel over its alleged false promise to match their first buy-in said Thursday that the company can't enforce an arbitration agreement in its terms of use because the terms were buried, making it impossible for the players to see or consent to them.
-
January 05, 2016
FanDuel Wants False Ad Suit Sent To Arbitration
Daily fantasy sports company FanDuel told a California federal court Monday that a proposed class action accusing it of luring new customers onto the site with the false promise of matching their first buy-in must be arbitrated under a provision of its terms of use.