Fernando Delgado et al v. FanDuel Inc et al

Track this case

Case Number:

2:15-cv-09907

Court:

California Central

Nature of Suit:

Contract: Other

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Fernando M. Olguin

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. June 03, 2016

    Panel Keeps FanDuel Deposit-Matching Scheme Suits In MDL

    The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation on Friday moved three more lawsuits over FanDuel's $200 deposit-matching program into the daily fantasy sports multidistrict litigation despite the objections of plaintiffs in two of the cases.

  2. February 12, 2016

    FanDuel Says Terms Demand Arbitration In False Ad Suit

    FanDuel urged a California federal court on Thursday to enforce the arbitration provision of its terms of use in a proposed class action accusing the daily fantasy sports operator of making false promises about matching customer buy-ins, saying it's not the company's fault the players didn't read the terms.

  3. February 05, 2016

    FanDuel Arbitration Terms Called Too Hidden To Be Enforced

    Daily fantasy sports players suing FanDuel over its alleged false promise to match their first buy-in said Thursday that the company can't enforce an arbitration agreement in its terms of use because the terms were buried, making it impossible for the players to see or consent to them.

  4. January 05, 2016

    FanDuel Wants False Ad Suit Sent To Arbitration

    Daily fantasy sports company FanDuel told a California federal court Monday that a proposed class action accusing it of luring new customers onto the site with the false promise of matching their first buy-in must be arbitrated under a provision of its terms of use.