Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
GARDNER DENVER, INC. v. ARCH INSURANCE COMPANY et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-00159
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Armstrong Teasdale
- Bailey Cavalieri
- Cozen O'Connor
- Fox Rothschild
- Gilbert LLP
- Montgomery McCracken
- Obermayer Rebmann
- White and Williams
Companies
- Arch Capital Group Ltd.
- CNA Financial Corp.
- Gardner Denver Inc.
- Lions Gate Entertainment Corp.
- Starz LLC
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 19, 2016
Insurers Can't Trim Gardner Denver's Coverage Suit
A Pennsylvania federal judge Friday gave industrial equipment maker Gardner Denver the green light to advance claims that three of its former insurers wrongly failed to provide coverage for a shareholder suit over its merger with KKR & Co. that settled for $29 million, citing ambiguous contract language.
-
January 14, 2016
Gardner Denver Says Insurers Must Cover $29M Settlement
Industrial equipment maker Gardner Denver hit its insurers with a suit on Thursday in Pennsylvania federal court, alleging that they wrongly failed to provide coverage for an underlying shareholder suit over its merger with KKR & Co., which ended with a $29 million settlement.