Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Hardesty et al v. Kroger Co. et al
Case Number:
1:16-cv-00298
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 02, 2020
Kroger Recruiters Rightfully Exempt From OT, Judge Says
In-house recruiters for the Kroger Co. lost most of their early bid to hold the company liable for misclassifying them as exempt from overtime pay when an Ohio federal judge found that their position involved using enough discretion to justify the grocer's classification decision.
-
February 10, 2016
Ex-Kroger Recruiters Say Grocer Refused Rightful OT Pay
Kroger Co. on Tuesday was smacked with a proposed class action in Ohio federal court by a group of former in-house recruiters claiming they were denied overtime pay through the grocery chain's intentional misclassification of them as exempt employees, a violation of federal and state labor laws.