Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Orchard, Hiltz & McCliment v. Phoenix Insurance Co., et al
Case Number:
16-1176
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
January 20, 2017
No Coverage For Wastewater Explosion Suit, 6th Circ. Affirms
The Sixth Circuit on Friday affirmed a Michigan federal court's ruling that two insurers don't have to defend a project engineering firm in litigation over a fatal explosion at a wastewater treatment plant where it supervised upgrades, finding that coverage is barred by exclusions in both policies for claims stemming from the firm's professional services.
-
August 25, 2016
No Coverage For Fatal Explosion, Insurers Tell 6th Circ.
A pair of insurers urged the Sixth Circuit on Thursday to uphold a ruling that they don't have to defend a project engineering firm in a lawsuit over a fatal explosion at a wastewater treatment plant where it supervised upgrades, asserting that an exclusion for claims stemming from the firm's professional services clearly bars coverage.
-
June 22, 2016
Engineering Firm Covered For Fatal Explosion, 6th Circ. Hears
A project engineering firm told the Sixth Circuit on Wednesday that a pair of insurers should be required to cover its costs to defend a lawsuit over a fatal explosion at a wastewater treatment plant where it contracted to supervise upgrades, saying a Michigan federal court improperly ruled that an exclusion for claims stemming from professional services barred coverage.