Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Valspar Corp, et al v. E I Du Pont De Nemours & Co

  1. December 06, 2017

    3rd Circ. Rejects Redo Of DuPont $176M Price-Fixing Claims

    The Third Circuit Tuesday declined Valspar Corp.'s motion rehear a $176 million lawsuit accusing DuPont of chemical price fixing.

  2. October 23, 2017

    Antitrust Attys Back 3rd Circ. Rehearing In DuPont Suit

    The American Antitrust Institute on Friday asked to weigh in with the Third Circuit in support of Valspar Corp.'s bid for a rehearing to revive its $176 million price-fixing lawsuit against DuPont, telling the appellate court its earlier ruling is inconsistent with both its own and U.S. Supreme Court precedent.

  3. October 16, 2017

    Valspar Asks 3rd Circ. To Rethink 'Impossible' Price-Fixing Bar

    Valspar Corp. asked the Third Circuit to rehear en banc its bid to revive a $176 million lawsuit against DuPont, arguing Friday the panel strayed from precedent with a standard that would make it "virtually impossible" for a price-fixing suit against an oligopoly to survive summary judgment.

  4. October 03, 2017

    3rd Circ. Won't Revive $176M DuPont Price-Fixing Claims

    The Third Circuit declined to revive Valspar Corp.'s $176 million lawsuit accusing DuPont of conspiring to fix the price of titanium dioxide in a published opinion unsealed Monday, dealing a blow to plaintiffs reliant on circumstantial evidence to prove price fixing.

  5. March 09, 2017

    3rd Circ. Pushed To Revive $176M DuPont Price-Fixing Suit

    The Valspar Corp. on Thursday pushed the Third Circuit to revive a $176 million lawsuit accusing DuPont of conspiring to fix the price of titanium dioxide, arguing that if a lower court ruling stands, it would be impossible to advance price-fixing cases on circumstantial evidence alone.