Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C. et al v. Consumer Cellular, Inc.
Case Number:
2:16-cv-00152
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Alston & Bird
- Bracewell LLP
- Capshaw DeRieux
- Duane Morris
- Fenwick & West
- Findlay Craft
- Fish & Richardson
- Foley & Lardner
- Fox Swibel
- Gillam Smith
- Greenberg Traurig
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Parker Poe
- Siebman Law
- Winston & Strawn
Companies
- CVS Health Corp.
- Freedom Mortgage Corp.
- HealthSpring, Inc.
- LendingClub Corp.
- Marriott International Inc.
- Minnesota Life Insurance Co.
- Prosper Marketplace Inc.
- Securian Financial Group Inc.
- The Cigna Group
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 23, 2017
Patent Licensing Cos. Fight To Save IP Row From Dismissal
Two patent licensing companies on Wednesday hit back at a magistrate's recommendation to dismiss their infringement suits against Cigna, Consumer Cellular and others over 10 patents covering targeted email marketing technology, arguing that the defendants haven't established that the asserted claims are abstract under Alice.
-
March 10, 2017
IP In Suit Against Cigna, Others Too Abstract, Judge Says
A Texas federal judge on Wednesday recommended dismissing Phoenix Licensing's infringement suit against Cigna, Consumer Cellular and others, saying he could glean from 10 claims out of the 974 in the case that the patents protecting targeted email marketing technology were too abstract and unoriginal to pass the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice test.