Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Taser International, Inc. v. Phazzer Electronics, Inc. et al
Case Number:
6:16-cv-00366
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Allen Dyer Doppelt
- Anderson Creager
- Freeman Mathis
- Gordon Rees
- Hinshaw & Culbertson
- JB Law PLLC
- Kaufman Dolowich
- Latham Luna
- Quintairos Prieto
- Rapacke Law Group
- Weber Crabb
- Willis & Davidow
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 26, 2017
TASER Rival Zapped With Sanctions, Default Ruling In IP Row
A rival to TASER should not be stunned by an order to pay attorneys' fees, three times what it owes in damages and a default judgment after its "flagrant discovery abuse" and "contemptuous behavior" in a trademark and patent infringement case, a Florida federal judge has ruled.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →