Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Strumlauf et al v. Starbucks Corporation
Case Number:
3:16-cv-01306
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 05, 2016
Starbucks Can't Transfer Skimpy-Drink Suits, JPML Says
Four proposed class actions accusing Starbucks of tricking consumers by underfilling its drinks, two of which relate to lattes and two that involve iced beverages, don't sufficiently overlap and aren't complex enough to warrant centralization, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ruled Friday, striking down the retailer's transfer bid.
-
June 17, 2016
Starbucks Drinkers Can Move Ahead With Slimmed Latte Suit
Starbucks Corp. will have to face the bulk of a proposed class action alleging its baristas systematically serve drinks that aren't filled to the brim, according to a California court order Friday that kept alive claims the company is deceiving customers with its allegedly too-small drink recipes.
-
March 17, 2016
Starbucks Underfills Its Lattes, Suit Says
A pair of Starbucks Corp. latte drinkers have accused the coffee retailer of ripping off consumers by habitually underfilling its popular beverages by at least 25 percent, in violation of a number of California consumer protection laws, according to a proposed class action filed in California federal court on Wednesday.