Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
VidStream LLC v. Twitter Inc
Case Number:
3:16-cv-00764
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bruster PLLC
- Caldwell Cassady
- Carrington Coleman
- Friedman Suder
- Frost Brown
- Haynes & Boone
- Morrison Foerster
- Nelson Bumgardner
- Vitale Vickrey
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 04, 2022
Texas Attorney Says Vine Patent Case Will Cost Twitter $600M
A Dallas lawyer said Wednesday that his firm has been retained to represent VidStream in its long-running infringement case against Twitter over the social media company's defunct Vine app, a case he described as worth "beyond $600 million."
-
April 01, 2022
Texas Judge Says Vine Is Coming Back — In Patent Suit
More than five years after a Texas federal judge ruled that two patents covering a process of generating video clips were ineligible for patent protection under the Alice standard, he changed his mind Friday and revived a patent company's suit against Twitter over its long-defunct Vine app.
-
May 16, 2016
Twitter Says Patents In Vine Fight Fail Under Alice
Twitter asked a Texas federal judge Friday to trim claims that its Vine video service infringes Youtoo Technologies' recording and transcoding patents, saying two patents asserted by the gaming technology company are too abstract and uninventive to enforce under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice decision.
-
March 18, 2016
Texas Suit Targets Twitter Over Vine TV Tech
Twitter was hit Friday with a patent infringement suit in Texas federal court that alleges the tech giant strung along a Texas company for years with discussions of a potential partnership for its video sharing technology but instead copied the tech and used it for its Vine application.