Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Fluor Corporation v. Zurich American Insurance Company et al
Case Number:
4:16-cv-00429
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Carmody MacDonald
- Haar & Woods
- Harrison Law
- HeplerBroom
- Hunt Ortmann
- Husch Blackwell
- Latham & Watkins
- Pegue & Thompson
- Riley Safer
- Roberts Perryman
- Shipman & Goodwin
- Shook Hardy
- Troutman
- Watters Wolf
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 18, 2016
Latham Dodges DQ Bid In Zurich Lead Coverage Suit
A Missouri federal judge on Tuesday denied Zurich American Insurance's attempt to disqualify Latham & Watkins LLP from representing Fluor Corp. in a coverage dispute arising from lead smelting operations, saying there is no evidence the firm violated a protective order in a related state case.
-
August 10, 2016
Latham & Watkins Faces DQ Bid In Zurich's Lead Injury Suit
Zurich American Insurance on Wednesday asked a Missouri judge to disqualify Latham & Watkins LLP from representing Fluor Corp. in their dispute over coverage of an underlying smelting accident, saying the firm violated a protective order and used highly confidential documents from a separate case to the detriment of the insurer.
- ← Previous
- 1
- 2
- Next →