Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation
Case Number:
16-1945
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 12, 2018
Indigo Didn't Take Raytheon Trade Secrets, Fed. Circ. Says
The Federal Circuit on Thursday upheld an Eastern District of Texas jury verdict that Indigo Systems did not misappropriate trade secrets relating to infrared imaging technology owned by Raytheon.
-
January 12, 2018
Raytheon Mischaracterized Trade Secrets, Fed. Circ. Told
Thermal imaging company FLIR Systems Inc. fired back Friday at Raytheon's attempt to overturn a federal jury's decision that cleared FLIR of allegations that it stole the defense contractor's infrared camera technology, urging a Federal Circuit panel to not only uphold the decision but to award it attorneys' fees in the case as well.
-
September 01, 2016
Raytheon Asks Fed. Circ. To Revive Trade Secret Claims
Raytheon Co. urged the Federal Circuit Wednesday to revive its claims accusing Flir Systems of hiring ex-Raytheon employees in an attempt to acquire infrared camera trade secrets, arguing a jury wrongly decided Raytheon's trade secrets weren't misappropriated.