Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Hudock et al v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
Case Number:
0:16-cv-01220
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Fabyanske Westra
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hogan Lovells
- King & Spalding
- Lockridge Grindal
- Turke & Strauss
- Zimmerman Reed
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 31, 2020
TV Buyers Score Partial Cert. In Best Buy, LG False Ad Suit
Consumers who say they were tricked into buying television sets with slower refresh rates than advertised convinced a Minnesota federal judge this week to certify some of their claims against Best Buy and LG Electronics.
-
January 13, 2020
Best Buy, LG Want Out Of False Ad Suit Over TV Specs
Best Buy and LG Electronics say they deserve to be released from a proposed class action accusing them of selling televisions that didn't have the refresh rate advertised, telling a Minnesota federal judge that the four consumers left have weak claims.
-
January 31, 2018
LG, Best Buy Can't Duck Misleading TV Advertising Action
Best Buy and LG Electronics cannot escape a proposed class action from consumers who allege televisions they purchased did not have a 120Hz refresh rate as advertised, with a Minnesota federal judge finding there was enough evidence for consumer fraud claims to survive.