Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Michael Edenborough et al v. ADT, LLC et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-02233
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 22, 2019
ADT Gets Nod For $16M Deal Over Security Systems
A California federal judge on Monday approved a $16 million settlement between ADT LLC and customers who claimed the company hid that its security systems were vulnerable to hacking.
-
March 29, 2018
ADT Settlement Paused Amid 9th Circ. Hyundai Class Row
A California federal judge agreed Thursday to pause proceedings in five separate proposed class actions that home security company ADT agreed last March to settle for $16 million, citing the Ninth Circuit's recent axing of a $200 million settlement in multidistrict litigation involving automakers Hyundai and Kia.
-
March 24, 2017
ADT Agrees To Pay $16M To End Alarm Hackability Suits
ADT LLC has agreed to pay $16 million to end five separate proposed class actions alleging the home security company deceived consumers about the efficiency of its devices and their vulnerability to hacking, according to documents filed in California federal court on Thursday,
-
January 24, 2017
ADT Agrees To End Alarm Hackability Suits With Settlement
ADT LLC has reached an undisclosed settlement with groups of device owners in five separate proposed class actions who allege the home security company deceived consumers about the efficiency of its devices and their vulnerability to hacking, a California federal court filing said Tuesday.
-
October 24, 2016
ADT Alarm Hackability Suit Trimmed, Fraud Claim Remains
A California federal judge on Monday partially dismissed a proposed class action against home security company ADT LLC over its products' alleged susceptibility to hacking, though a claim that the company fraudulently hid from consumers that vulnerability was allowed to continue.
-
June 06, 2016
ADT Says Alarm Hackability Suit Fails For Lack Of Examples
Home security company ADT LLC told a California federal judge on Friday that a proposed class has failed to provide a single example to back up its claim that ADT's use of unencrypted wireless communication makes its systems easily hackable, saying it's not aware of any such hacking incident.