Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Gingras v. Rosette
Case Number:
16-2019
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
- American Association for Justice
- Public Citizen Inc.
- Sequoia Capital Operations LLC
- Technology Crossover Ventures LP
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 03, 2019
Biggest Native American Rulings Of 2019: Midyear Report
The U.S. Supreme Court handed close wins this year to two Native American tribes, backing their rights to be shielded from a state fuel tax and to hunt under their treaties, while circuit courts protected tribe members' access to broadband and heightened tribal officers' exposure to tort suits. Here, Law360 looks back at some of the top decisions in Native American law in the first half of 2019.
-
May 09, 2019
Tribal Officers Urge 2nd Circ. To Rethink Lending Decision
Officers of tribe-owned lending company Plain Green LLC urged the Second Circuit to reconsider its ruling that they don't have tribal immunity to a suit alleging they charged excessively high loan interest rates, saying that allowing state law claims against them marked an "unprecedented intrusion on tribal sovereignty."
-
April 24, 2019
2nd Circ. Says Tribal Officers Not Immune In Payday Loan Suit
The Second Circuit on Wednesday rejected a bid by officers of tribe-owned lending company Plain Green LLC to escape a suit claiming they charged exorbitant interest rates on so-called payday loans, saying tribal immunity didn't extend to them and loan agreements meant to compel arbitration couldn't be enforced.
-
May 12, 2017
Tribal Leaders Immune In Payday Loan Suit, 2nd Circ. Hears
Officials of Chippewa Cree payday lender Plain Green LLC asked the Second Circuit Friday to find a lower court erred in not recognizing their sovereign immunity as tribal officials in allowing a proposed racketeering and consumer protection class action by customers to proceed.
-
January 31, 2017
Payday Lender Tells 2nd Circ. Claims Must Go To Arbitration
Affiliates of Chippewa Cree payday lender Plain Green LLC urged the Second Circuit Monday to overturn a Vermont federal court decision that they are subject to a proposed Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act class action by customers in the Green Mountain State, saying the borrowers had clearly agreed to have their claims sent to arbitration.