Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Gregory Ingalls et al v. Spotify USA Inc.
Case Number:
3:16-cv-03533
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
July 27, 2017
Spotify Users Lose Cert. Bid Over Slippery Lead Plaintiff
A California federal judge denied class certification Thursday to a group of Spotify USA Inc. users who signed up for a discount trial period but were allegedly tricked into paying for the streaming service after it auto-renewed, citing discovery findings that the lead plaintiff did in fact continue to use the service after the trial period ended.
-
July 17, 2017
Spotify Can't End Auto-Renewal Suit After 'Trick,' Alsup Says
U.S. District Judge William Alsup on Monday rejected Spotify USA Inc.'s bid to end a putative class action over subscription auto-renewals after telling lawyers for the music streaming service during a recent hearing that they had tried to trick him into believing the lead plaintiff had "admitted the case away" in his deposition when he hadn't.
-
July 13, 2017
Alsup Says Davis Wright Attys For Spotify Misled Him
U.S. District Judge William Alsup said at a hearing on Thursday that Spotify's attorneys from Davis Wright Tremaine LLP misled him in their bid to end a putative class action over auto-renewals, saying that the lawyers tricked him into believing the lead plaintiff had "admitted the case away" in his deposition when he hadn't.
-
June 02, 2017
Spotify Seeks Quick Win In Customers' Auto-Renewal Suit
Spotify urged a California federal judge Thursday to end a proposed class action brought by customers who said the streaming service failed to inform them it would automatically renew their subscriptions, arguing that the customers declined to read a prominent disclosure statement.
-
November 15, 2016
Spotify Can't Arbitrate Subscription Auto-Renewal Dispute
A California federal judge ruled on Monday that Spotify USA Inc. can't compel a proposed class of Spotify users to arbitrate their claims that the music streaming service violated state statutes when it allegedly automatically renewed customers' subscription services without their consent.