United States of America v Rolls-Royce North America, Inc., et al

  1. March 13, 2018

    Rolls-Royce Wins Bids To Exit FCA Suit, DQ Atty

    A Texas federal judge agreed Monday with a magistrate judge's conclusions that Rolls-Royce should escape a False Claims Act suit alleging it billed the U.S. Air Force for uncertified parts and that the whistleblower's attorney should be disqualified, saying the relator unsuccessfully pursued these claims previously and his attorney once worked for the company.

  2. February 13, 2018

    Rolls-Royce Should Win FCA Suit Toss, Atty DQ: Magistrate

    Rolls-Royce shouldn't have to face a False Claims Act suit over allegedly billing the U.S. Air Force for uncertified parts, according to a Texas magistrate's report Tuesday that found the whistleblower was repeating claims from an old suit and that he was represented by an ex-Rolls attorney.

  3. September 20, 2017

    Rolls-Royce Wants FCA Claims Tossed, Atty DQ'd

    Rolls-Royce North America Inc. told a Texas federal court Tuesday that a former consultant accusing the company of improperly billing the U.S. Air Force for uncertified parts from crashed aircraft has made too-vague allegations and that his counsel once represented Rolls-Royce and should be disqualified.

  4. August 24, 2017

    Whistleblower Can't Nix Judge From Rolls-Royce FCA Suit

    A Texas federal judge on Wednesday shot down a relator's bid to have a judge removed from a False Claims Act suit alleging Rolls-Royce North America Inc. and others improperly billed the Air Force for uncertified parts from crashed aircraft, saying there was no evidence adverse rulings against the relator stemmed from bias or antagonism.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!