Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Exergen Corporation v. Kaz Usa, Inc.
Case Number:
16-2315
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
March 16, 2018
Fed. Circ. Affirms Exergen Ruling Doesn't Set Precedent
The Federal Circuit on Friday held firm that there's nothing precedential about its recent decision that Exergen Corp.'s forehead thermometer is patentable, despite assertions from a rival company that it was a "significant development" in deciding the patent eligibility of diagnostic tests.
-
March 12, 2018
Recent Patent-Eligibility Cases Leave Unanswered Questions
In a series of recent decisions, the Federal Circuit has upheld patents and found that they do not claim patent-ineligible abstract ideas or laws of nature, but the rulings have left attorneys pining for more guidance about where the court will draw the line on patent eligibility in future cases.
-
March 08, 2018
Fed. Circ. Says Exergen Thermometer Patents Survive Mayo
The Federal Circuit on Thursday upheld a decision that Exergen Corp.'s forehead thermometer patents are not invalid for claiming laws of nature, though it found that only one of the two patents was infringed by Kaz USA Inc. and vacated a $15 million damages award.