United Media Holdings NV v. Forbes Media LLC

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

1:16-cv-05926

Court:

New York Southern

Nature of Suit:

Other Statutes: Arbitration

Judge:

P. Kevin Castel

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. August 10, 2017

    Judge Won't Ax Forbes Award Over Ukrainian Edition

    A New York federal judge on Wednesday denied a pair of companies' bid to vacate an arbitration award that blocked them from publishing the Ukrainian edition of Forbes, rejecting their contention that the arbitrator acted unfairly by declining to postpone proceedings at certain times.

  2. July 26, 2017

    Forbes Seeks To Keep Award Over Ukrainian Magazine Intact

    Forbes Media LLC asked a New York federal judge Tuesday to deny a pair of companies' bid to vacate an arbitration award that blocked them from publishing the magazine in Ukraine, saying the judge's decision has the potential to end related litigation in the country.

  3. November 02, 2016

    Ukrainian Cos. Can Revise Argument In Forbes Arbitral Case

    A New York federal judge ruled Tuesday that a billionaire who ran the Ukrainian edition of Forbes until he was shackled with U.S. sanctions and lost his publishing license in arbitration can't yet demand documents that could show the arbitral process was illegal, but can submit a revised argument for why the arbitrator's decision should be thrown out.

  4. August 23, 2016

    Forbes Touts Approval To Enforce Arbitral Award

    Forbes Media LLC told a New York judge Tuesday that it has obtained federal permission to enforce an arbitration award resolving a licensing dispute over a Ukrainian version of Forbes magazine, a flap that involved a Ukrainian businessman who had been sanctioned by U.S. authorities.

  5. August 16, 2016

    Forbes Wants Award Over Ukrainian Magazine Preserved

    Forbes LLC asked a New York court on Monday not to disturb an arbitration award resolving a licensing dispute over a Ukrainian version of its magazine, arguing that a sanctions order against the owner of the two businesses that lost the arbitration didn't negate the arbitrator's authority over the dispute.