Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
HOOD v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES INC et al
Case Number:
1:16-cv-00998
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 03, 2019
Uber To Shell Out $1.3M To End Drivers' FLSA Suit
A North Carolina federal judge on Thursday approved a $1.3 million settlement Uber Technologies Inc. reached with a class of more than 5,000 drivers alleging the company misclassified them as independent contractors, finding the deal is a "fair and reasonable resolution" to the Fair Labor Standards Act dispute.
-
October 16, 2018
Uber Reaches $1.3M Deal In Drivers' Collective FLSA Action
Uber Technologies Inc. will pay $1.3 million to settle Fair Labor Standards Act claims from more than 5,000 drivers who aren't bound by arbitration agreements and alleged the ride-hailing giant misclassified them as independent contractors instead of employees, according to a North Carolina federal court filing Tuesday.
-
July 13, 2017
Judge Gives Conditional Cert. Of FLSA Class Against Uber
A North Carolina federal judge on Wednesday conditionally approved a collective action class of Uber Technologies Inc. drivers who opted out of an arbitration agreement in their contracts in a Fair Labor Standards Act case that accused the ride-hailing company of misclassifying drivers as independent contractors.