Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
In re Pokemon Go Nuisance Litigation
Case Number:
3:16-cv-04300
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 22, 2019
Pokemon Go Nuisance Deal Nets Pomerantz $4M In Atty Fees
The company behind the popular Pokemon Go augmented reality game must try to dissuade players from trespassing on private property, pay Pomerantz LLP $4 million in attorney fees and pay named plaintiffs $1,000 each in a settlement agreement granted final approval by a California federal judge on Thursday.
-
February 15, 2019
Pokemon Co. Promises No 'Go' In Deal To End Trespass Row
Niantic Inc., the company behind Pokemon Go, has promised to take steps aimed at dissuading players of the popular augmented reality game from trespassing on private property and causing other nuisances, as part of a proposed settlement outlined in documents filed Thursday in California federal court.
-
March 29, 2018
Pokémon Go Trespass Row Raises Novel Issues, Judge Says
"Pokémon Go" maker Niantic Inc. can't defeat a proposed class action alleging it encouraged users to trespass, as a California federal judge said the case raises novel notions of "virtual trespassing," and "open questions and closing the courtroom door do not go together."
-
July 27, 2017
'Pokémon Go' Maker Escapes Trespass Class Action, For Now
A California federal judge Thursday threw out claims that "Pokémon Go" maker Niantic Inc. was responsible for players trespassing on private land, saying the putative class was too broad and the plaintiffs failed to show that purported damages exceeded the $5 million minimum required for federal subject matter jurisdiction.
-
March 03, 2017
'Pokémon Go' Maker Encouraged Trespassing, Court Told
A proposed class of property owners on Thursday fired back at "Pokémon Go" developer Niantic's argument that it wasn't responsible for players' alleged trespass on private land, telling a California federal court that the company had ample opportunity to curb the intrusion but instead "encouraged and rewarded" the conduct.
-
January 30, 2017
'Pokémon Go' Maker Says Players' Trespass Not Its Problem
The developer and marketer behind Pokémon Go hit back Friday at a proposed class action in California federal court accusing them of profiting from a game that encourages users to illegally wander onto private property, arguing that they weren't responsible for individual players' actions and had done nothing wrong.