Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Products
- Lexis Advance
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Updates
- Law360 Podcasts
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Rankings
- Data-Driven Lawyers
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Glass Ceiling Report
- Global 20
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Site Menu
- Join the Law360 team
- Search legal jobs
- Learn more about Law360
- Read testimonials
- Contact Law360
- Sign up for our newsletters
- Site Map
- Help
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. John Finn, et al
Case Number:
16-16368
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 14, 2019
9th Circ. Sends CRT Settlement Back To Correct Error
A California federal judge will reconsider a $576.8 million bundle of antitrust settlements after the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday remanded a certification order and settlement approval for a class of indirect cathode ray tube purchasers.
-
April 10, 2018
9th Circ. Judge Rips Indirect Buyers’ $577M CRT Settlement
A Ninth Circuit judge on Tuesday criticized lead counsel for indirect buyers of cathode ray tubes who secured a $576.8 million bundle of antitrust settlements with tech giants like Philips and Panasonic, saying it’s a “problem” that they secured the nationwide deals without looking out for people in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Missouri.