Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Indirect Purchaser Plaintiffs, et al v. John Finn, et al
Case Number:
16-16368
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
February 14, 2019
9th Circ. Sends CRT Settlement Back To Correct Error
A California federal judge will reconsider a $576.8 million bundle of antitrust settlements after the Ninth Circuit on Wednesday remanded a certification order and settlement approval for a class of indirect cathode ray tube purchasers.
-
April 10, 2018
9th Circ. Judge Rips Indirect Buyers' $577M CRT Settlement
A Ninth Circuit judge on Tuesday criticized lead counsel for indirect buyers of cathode ray tubes who secured a $576.8 million bundle of antitrust settlements with tech giants like Philips and Panasonic, saying it's a "problem" that they secured the nationwide deals without looking out for people in Massachusetts, New Hampshire and Missouri.