Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Albert Heber v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Case Number:
8:16-cv-01525
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Ahdoot & Wolfson
- Bisnar Chase
- Chimicles Schwartz
- Haffner Law PC
- Kabateck LLP
- McNeil Tropp
- Milberg Coleman
- Shook Hardy
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 12, 2021
Toyota Can't Duck Claims Soy-Coated Wiring Attracted Rats
A California federal judge won't let Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc. escape for a second time a proposed class action alleging that its switch to a soy-based covering for wires in its vehicles attracted rats, saying the court is bound by the Ninth Circuit's findings in the case.
-
June 12, 2018
Toyota Sheds Suit Alleging Car Wires Enticed Hungry Rats
A California federal judge dismissed Toyota owners' class claims that the automaker sold them vehicles with soy-coated wires that attracted rats, ruling Monday that the alleged damages did not fall under either express or implied warranties.