Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
PATTERSON v. FOREVER 21, INC. et al
Case Number:
3:16-cv-05087
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 26, 2018
Forever 21 Doesn't Have To Face Suit Over Website Terms
A New Jersey federal judge has tossed a proposed class action alleging clothing retailer Forever 21 imposes unduly strict terms for online purchases, citing recent state high court precedent that consumers must show they were harmed by unfair terms in order to get a payout.
-
February 08, 2017
Forever 21 Suit Stayed Until 3rd Circ. Weighs In On Spokeo
A New Jersey federal judge on Wednesday paused a woman's proposed class action accusing Forever 21 Inc. of violating state law by imposing overly strict terms and conditions on consumer purchases, in light of pending interpretation by the Third Circuit of the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Spokeo ruling.