Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Frost et al v. LG Corp., et al
Case Number:
5:16-cv-05206
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Berger Montague
- Bledsoe Diestel
- Cotchett Pitre
- Eimer Stahl
- Gustafson Gluek
- Hartley LLP
- Heins Mills
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Schneider Wallace
- Wexler Boley
- Wright L'Estrange
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 29, 2018
LG, Samsung Anti-Poaching Suit Gets Axed Again
A California federal judge has tossed a consolidated putative class action brought by employees who claim LG and Samsung broke antitrust laws by agreeing not to poach each other's workers, finding that the employees were asking her to make "too big of a leap" by substituting stereotypes about Korean family-owned conglomerates for factual allegations.
-
April 24, 2017
LG, Samsung Anti-Poaching Suit Gets Tossed, For Now
A California federal judge on Friday tossed with leave to amend a consolidated putative class action brought by employees who allege LG and Samsung broke antitrust laws by agreeing not to poach one another's workers, finding that the allegations are too vague.
-
March 22, 2017
LG's Sanctions Bid Rebuffed By Workers In Anti-Poach Suit
A putative class alleging LG and Samsung broke antitrust laws by agreeing not to poach one another's employees asked a California federal judge on Tuesday to deny LG's sanctions request, saying the case is based on factual evidence including a Samsung agent's admission she was instructed not to recruit from LG.
-
January 24, 2017
Samsung, LG Say Anti-Poach Suit Uses Korean 'Stereotypes'
LG and Samsung urged a California federal judge Monday to toss an antitrust class action accusing them of agreeing not to poach each other's employees, arguing the suit relies on stereotypes about Korean companies in lieu of alleging even basic details about the supposed conspiracy.
-
September 12, 2016
Samsung, LG Workers Sue Over Anti-Poaching Deal
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and LG Corp. are accused of illegally agreeing not to poach each other's employees, which allegedly resulted in unlawful wage suppression, according to a proposed class action filed in California federal court on Friday, the latest such suit targeting companies with a large presence in Silicon Valley.