Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Mitchell et al v. Wells Fargo Bank et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-00966
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 29, 2017
Wells Fargo Can't Arbitrate $1B Phony Accounts Suit Yet
A Utah federal judge on Wednesday held off on deciding whether to force arbitration on several dozen of the Wells Fargo account holders behind a proposed class action seeking more than $1 billion in damages from the California-based bank for opening accounts without customer approval.
-
January 02, 2017
Consumer Protection Cases To Watch In 2017
The coming year will likely be a big one for consumer protection attorneys, with ongoing litigation accusing major players such as Wells Fargo and Volkswagen of shady business practices and decisions that could mean big changes for the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Federal Trade Commission seemingly poised to land before the U.S. Supreme Court. Here, Law360 highlights the top consumer protection cases of 2017.
-
September 16, 2016
Wells Fargo Customers Lodge Action Over Phony Accounts
Customers of Wells Fargo & Co. hit the bank with a proposed class action in Utah federal court on Friday over the bank's employees opening thousands of accounts without customer approval, saying the bank's internal policies drove the illegal conduct.