Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Core Wireless Licensing v. LG Electronics, Inc.
Case Number:
16-2684
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
May 03, 2018
Fed. Circ. Rejects LG Claim Of 'Sweeping' Alice Exception
The full Federal Circuit on Thursday denied LG’s bid for rehearing of a decision that display patents it was found to infringe are not invalid as abstract, declining to consider the company’s claim that the ruling created a “sweeping exception” to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Alice test.
-
April 03, 2018
Full Fed. Circ. Told Patent In LG Case Rightly Survived Alice
Core Wireless urged the Federal Circuit on Monday to reject LG's en banc petition arguing that the court misread the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling when it upheld the validity of two Core patents, saying the decision was "entirely consistent" with the high court's test.
-
January 25, 2018
Fed. Circ. Says Display Patents LG Infringed Survive Alice
The Federal Circuit on Thursday upheld U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap's findings that Core Wireless' display patents were infringed by LG and are not invalid under Alice, saying the patents do not claim abstract ideas as LG had argued.