Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Power Integrations, Inc. v. Fairchild Semiconductor
Case Number:
16-2691
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 05, 2018
Fed. Circ. Urged Not To Rehear Axing Of $140M IP Verdict
Fairchild Semiconductor urged the full Federal Circuit on Tuesday to reject Power Integrations' petition for a rehearing of a panel decision that vacated a $140 million damages award over the infringement of two Power Integrations chip patents, saying the court "correctly applied well-established law."
-
July 13, 2018
Big Patent Paydays Remain Tough With $140M Fed. Circ. Ax
A recent Federal Circuit ruling that threw out $140 million in patent damages won by Power Integrations Inc. shows that the appeals court is keeping a close eye on sizable verdicts and making it difficult for patentees to base damages theories on a product's entire value, attorneys say.
-
July 03, 2018
Fed. Circ. Junks $140M Chip Patent Verdict Against Fairchild
The Federal Circuit on Tuesday vacated a California federal jury's $140 million damages award against Fairchild for infringing two Power Integrations electronic chip patents and ordered a new trial to redetermine the damages amount, saying the lower court used the wrong rule in its calculation.