Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Amgen Inc. v. Apotex Inc.
Case Number:
17-1010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
830 Patent Infringement (Fed. Question)
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
November 13, 2017
Fed. Circ. Clears Apotex In Neulasta Biosimilar Patent Row
A Federal Circuit panel upheld a lower court ruling that found Apotex Inc. did not infringe a patent covering Amgen Inc.'s blockbuster drug Neulasta, while clarifying the amount of weight courts should put on statements made in the prelitigation process by companies making biosimilars.
-
October 03, 2017
Fed. Circ. Looks At Early Statements In Neulasta Patent Row
Federal Circuit judges on Tuesday questioned how much weight courts should put on statements made in the prelitigation process by companies making copycat versions of biologic drugs, as Amgen looks to overturn a ruling that cleared Apotex of infringing a patent related to its blockbuster biologic Neulasta.