Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
X One, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Case Number:
5:16-cv-06050
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
October 15, 2018
Uber Failed To Prove Location Tracking Patent Invalid: PTAB
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has upheld two X One Inc. patents on location tracking technology, with the board finding that the claims challenged by Uber Technologies Inc. were not obvious in light of prior art.
-
October 25, 2017
Uber Gets App IP Suit Stayed Pending USPTO Review
A California federal judge on Tuesday granted Uber Technologies Inc.'s request to stay phone application developer X One Inc.'s suit over allegedly infringed "two-way position information sharing technology" patents pending inter partes review by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
-
March 17, 2017
Uber Loses Bid To Narrow Protective Order In Patent Fight
A California federal judge said Thursday that phone application developer X One Inc. doesn't have to get separate counsel to handle claim construction in a patent suit against Uber Technologies Inc., finding that a protective order requested by both parties provides enough safeguards.
-
March 07, 2017
Uber Can't Nix Location-Detecting Patents Under Alice
A California federal judge on Monday rejected Uber Technologies Inc.'s bid to toss phone application developer X One Inc.'s suit accusing it of infringing its location-detecting patents, finding that the asserted claims are patent-eligible under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice ruling.
-
February 06, 2017
Judge Koh Asks Uber To Let Young Attys Argue Patent Case
U.S. District Judge Lucy H. Koh on Friday asked Uber Technologies Inc. if it would be willing to let a younger Reed Smith LLP attorney argue motions that would end a location-detection patent suit, calling to boost associates' experience on high-stakes filings.