Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Anderson et al v. Bridgestone Corporation et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-14057
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Arnold & Porter
- Fink Bressack
- Kerr Russell
- Kohn Swift
- Morgan Lewis
- Preti Flaherty
- Sidley Austin
- Weil Gotshal
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 12, 2019
Tire Cos. Say DOJ Docs Are Off-Limits In Antitrust Row
Bridgestone Corp. and several other major tire companies have told a Michigan federal court that they should not have to release documents tied to a U.S. Department of Justice antitrust probe of the industry until questions about the purchaser plaintiffs are resolved.
-
August 28, 2019
Auto Parts Buyers Want DOJ Docs In Antitrust Row
A group of litigants accusing Bridgestone and other tire companies of plotting to fix prices for anti-vibrational rubber car parts urged a Michigan federal judge Tuesday to force the companies to release documents tied to a U.S. Department of Justice antitrust probe of the industry.
-
March 30, 2018
Bridgestone, Other Tire Cos. Can't Escape Price-Fixing MDL
A Michigan federal judge on Thursday refused to let several tire companies, including Bridgestone Corp., duck an antitrust suit over anti-vibrational rubber parts for cars, saying the companies have failed to bat down allegations they sold the parts at inflated prices.