Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Troy Larkin, et al v. GoPro, Inc.
Case Number:
4:16-cv-06654
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
-
February 15, 2019
GoPro Will Pay $6.75M To End Stock Drop Suit
A proposed class of investors suing GoPro Inc. for allegedly concealing missteps that caused its stock to drop have asked a California federal court to approve a $6.75 million settlement to put those claims to rest, calling the deal an "excellent result."
-
June 12, 2018
GoPro Investors Seek Cert. In Undersupply, Defect Suit
A proposed class of investors who say they overpaid for shares of GoPro Inc. because the company concealed shortages of its cameras and drones as well as a design defect asked a California federal court Monday for class certification.
-
July 27, 2017
GoPro Can't Escape Investors' Drone Recall Suit
A California federal judge refused Wednesday to toss claims that GoPro Inc. misled its shareholders into thinking "amazingly smooth" aerial footage could be captured from a now-recalled line of drones that fell out of the sky midflight.
-
June 27, 2017
GoPro Investors' Drone Recall Suit Gains Altitude
A California federal judge said Tuesday she's not inclined to toss a GoPro shareholders' stock-drop suit linked to a recalled line of drones that fell out of the sky mid-flight, after investors argued that GoPro knew the drones were defective when it released them.
-
May 16, 2017
Investors Shoot Down GoPro Dismissal Bid In Drone Suit
A proposed class of GoPro Inc. shareholders have urged a California federal judge not to ditch their stock-drop suit linked to a recall of a line of drones, saying that company statements about the drone's abilities were clearly false.
-
April 14, 2017
GoPro Says Investors' Drone Recall Suit Relies On Hindsight
GoPro Inc. attempted to dodge a shareholder stock-drop suit linked to a recall of its Karma drones, which were reported to lose power midflight and fall out of the sky, telling a California federal court on Thursday that the allegations amount to "a classic fraud-by-hindsight case."