Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
KAIST IP US LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., et al
Case Number:
2:16-cv-01314
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Bush Seyferth
- Capshaw DeRieux
- Covington & Burling
- Fish & Richardson
- Gillam Smith
- Glaser Weil
- Irell & Manella
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Lathrop GPM
- McKool Smith
- MoloLamken
- Nixon Peabody
- Parker Bunt
- Paul Hastings
- Quinn Emanuel
- Skiermont Derby
- Stewart Sokol
- Willkie Farr
- Wolf Greenfield
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
September 10, 2020
KAIST, Samsung Settle $203M Patent Suit Over Firm's Protest
Samsung cut a deal to end a patent infringement suit by the intellectual property arm of a South Korean research university following the university's $400 million jury win, which Samsung had challenged, and despite objections from the university's former counsel, according to a Texas federal judge's order dismissing the suit Wednesday.
-
February 20, 2020
KAIST Agrees To $203M Award In Samsung Patent Fight
Samsung may be on the hook for $203 million in damages after the intellectual property arm of a South Korean research university told a Texas federal judge that it will take a lower figure rather than go through a new trial in its patent lawsuit against Samsung.
-
June 15, 2018
KAIST Wins $400M Patent Verdict Against Samsung, Others
A Texas federal jury awarded the intellectual property arm of a South Korean research university $400 million Friday in a case accusing Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., Qualcomm Inc. and GlobalFoundries Inc. of infringing a patent related to semiconductor technology, the plaintiff's attorneys told Law360.
-
June 07, 2018
Qualcomm Took Too Long To Try To Move Patent Case
Qualcomm Inc. and GlobalFoundries Inc. must face infringement allegations over a patent related to semiconductor technology in the Eastern District of Texas, U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap ruled Wednesday, agreeing with a magistrate judge's finding that the companies waited too long to ask for the case to be moved to another court.
-
January 03, 2018
Qualcomm Rips Magistrate's Venue Change Report In IP Row
Qualcomm Inc. and GlobalFoundries Inc. argued Tuesday that a magistrate judge was wrong to say their motions for transfer due to improper venue were filed too late, telling a Texas federal court that they had not yet waived the defense made possible by the U.S. Supreme Court's TC Heartland decision.
-
December 20, 2017
Qualcomm Took Too Long To Challenge Venue In Patent Case
Qualcomm Inc. and GlobalFoundries Inc. should have to face infringement allegations over a patent related to semiconductor technology in the Eastern District of Texas, a judge said, finding the companies waited too long to ask for the case be moved to another court.