Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Shah et al v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. et al

  1. July 31, 2020

    Glancy Prongay Seeks $18.2M In Zimmer Biomet Settlement

    Attorneys at Glancy Prongay & Murray LLP representing investors in a $50 million settlement with medical device company Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. asked an Indiana federal judge on Thursday to approve its request of $18.2 million in attorney fees and expenses.

  2. April 14, 2020

    Zimmer Biomet Agrees to $50M Investor Settlement

    Medical device company Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. has agreed to pay $50 million to end investor claims it intentionally hid compliance problems at a critical manufacturing facility, thereby hurting its shareholders.

  3. April 12, 2019

    Zimmer Biomet Investors Seek Class Cert. In Stock-Drop Suit

    Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc. investors asked an Indiana federal court for class certification in their suit accusing the medical device manufacturer of intentionally hiding compliance problems at a major factory, which they say led to substantial stock drops when the issues were revealed.

  4. September 28, 2018

    PE Firms Let Out Of Zimmer Investors' Stock-Drop Suit

    An Indiana federal judge has dismissed insider trading claims against 18 private equity firms but otherwise left intact a proposed investor class action alleging medical device manufacturer Zimmer Biomet knowingly concealed compliance issues at a key factory that, when disclosed, led to substantial stock drops.