Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Jane Does 1-10, et al v. David Daleiden, et al
Case Number:
16-36038
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 14, 2017
Fetal Tissue Researchers Must Prove Privacy Need: 9th Circ.
The Ninth Circuit reversed a ruling Monday preventing an anti-abortion organization from obtaining identifying information for University of Washington fetal tissue researchers, saying more information was needed on how the disclosure would violate the researchers' constitutional rights and remanding the matter back to the lower court.
-
March 17, 2017
EPIC, SPLC Wade Into Fetal Tissue Researcher Privacy Suit
A group of University of Washington fetal tissue researchers locked in a Ninth Circuit battle to keep their personal information from being disclosed by an anti-abortion group found support Thursday from the Electronic Privacy Information Center, the Southern Poverty Law Center and a host of medical and women's rights organizations.
-
March 13, 2017
Researchers Urge 9th Circ. To Deny Names To Abortion Foes
A proposed class of fetal tissue researchers on Thursday asked the Ninth Circuit to affirm a Washington federal court's preliminary injunction blocking the University of Washington from providing their names to an anti-abortion group when fulfilling a public records request, saying to do so would needlessly expose them to harm, violating their right to privacy.