Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Ferrari, et al v. Autobahn, Inc. et al
Case Number:
4:17-cv-00018
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Clark Hill
- Hanson Bridgett
- Hogan Lovells
- Parker Poe
- Scali Rasmussen
- Varnell & Warwick
- Williams & Connolly
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
August 29, 2018
Drivers Get Initial Approval Of $1.6M Autobahn Parts Deal
A federal judge in California has given preliminary approval to a $1.6 million settlement and class certification in a case alleging that Autobahn Inc. misled a group of drivers into believing it used genuine Mercedes parts to repair their vehicles.
-
June 05, 2018
Autobahn Defends $1.6M Settlement In Auto Parts Suit
While confident it would prevail at trial, Autobahn Inc. told a California federal judge Monday that a $1.6 million settlement reached last month would be a cheaper and preferable outcome for both the company and the group of drivers alleging it misled them into believing it used genuine Mercedes parts to repair their vehicles.
-
May 25, 2018
Drivers Must Say Why They Altered Autobahn Suit Without OK
A California federal judge on Friday demanded to know why a group of drivers amended their claims against auto dealer Autobahn Inc. this month without first seeking leave of court, saying she will strike the revised complaint unless the drivers show cause for their actions.
-
May 23, 2018
Drivers Amend Autobahn Parts Suit To Facilitate $1.6M Deal
A group of drivers amended their claims in California federal court Tuesday against auto dealer Autobahn Inc. to help effectuate a proposed settlement that would provide the drivers with $1.6 million in vouchers for dropping claims the company misled them into believing it used genuine Mercedes parts to repair their vehicles.
-
May 07, 2018
CORRECTED: Auto Dealer Reaches $1.6M Deal To End Parts Allegations
Drivers accusing Golden State auto dealer Autobahn Inc. of misrepresenting to customers that it repairs vehicles with genuine Mercedes-Benz parts urged a California federal court to preliminarily approve a settlement that would pay the proposed class roughly $1.6 million in vouchers and their attorneys up to $577,000. Correction: A previous version of this story misstated the settlement amount. The error has been corrected.