November 08, 2018
The Internal Revenue Service must face claims by three companies seeking a refund of taxes levied against them as alter egos of a recycling company, a Missouri federal court ruled Wednesday.
October 16, 2018
A Missouri federal court should strike some of the government's evidence in a multimillion-dollar tax dispute against three recycling businesses because the U.S. unfairly withheld the information for too long, hampering the companies' ability to respond, they told the court in a recent filing.
September 25, 2018
The U.S. has failed to prove that three Missouri recycling businesses should be held liable for $23 million in taxes owed by a document destruction company, the companies told a Missouri federal court in a recent filing.
August 20, 2018
The U.S. government has asked a Missouri federal judge to dismiss a lawsuit brought by private equity-backed recycling companies regarding a levy for the 2006 tax year, now in excess of $23 million, imposed by the Internal Revenue Service.
December 14, 2017
A Missouri federal court denied a group of private equity-backed recycling companies' bid for a quick win Wednesday in a $9.4 million tax fight, saying the IRS had met its burden of showing probable cause to believe a nexus existed between the companies' bank accounts and a separate company that is allegedly an alter ego.
October 24, 2017
A Missouri federal court on Monday ordered a trio of private equity-backed recycling companies to provide documents to the Internal Revenue Service that may prove they are alter egos of a delinquent taxpayer in a $22 million tax suit.
September 19, 2017
The IRS asked a Missouri federal court Monday not to narrow the discovery window in a suit lodged by private equity-backed recycling companies over a $22 million tax liability, arguing that the court must look beyond the year the taxes were assessed in.
January 13, 2017
A group of California recycling companies is suing the U.S. government over a $22 million federal tax liability, saying the Internal Revenue Service, without offering any supporting evidence, falsely accused them of being alter egos of the company responsible for the bill.