Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Aspic Engineering and Construction Company v. ECC Centcom Constructors LLC et al
Case Number:
4:17-cv-00224
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
-
July 26, 2017
Afghan Contractor To Take Vacated $1.07M Award To 9th Circ.
An Afghan subcontractor informed a California federal judge Wednesday it is appealing her decision to vacate a $1.07 million arbitration award issued in a dispute stemming from U.S. government prime contracts for construction in Afghanistan, a decision the judge had made after finding the arbitrator ignored the subcontracts' terms.
-
May 26, 2017
$1.07M Award OK'd 'By Mistake' Axed In Contractor Spat
A California federal judge on Thursday vacated a state court decision confirming a $1.07 million arbitration award issued to an Afghan subcontractor following a dispute stemming from U.S. government prime contracts for construction in Afghanistan, finding that the judgment had been entered "by mistake."
-
February 21, 2017
Contractor Asks Fed. Judge To Ax Calif. Court's $1.1M 'Error'
A government contractor Tuesday asked a California federal judge to throw out a state court’s ruling upholding a $1.07 million arbitration award arising from a dispute with a subcontractor in Afghanistan, saying the ruling was clearly entered in error.