Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Rice, et al. v. Genworth Financial Incorporated, et al.
Case Number:
3:17-cv-00059
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Faruqi & Faruqi
- Gainey McKenna
- Glancy Prongay
- Hunton Andrews
- Johnson Fistel
- Kahn Swick
- Levi & Korsinsky
- MeyerGoergen PC
- O'Kelly & Ernst
- Shelley Cupp
- Weil Gotshal
- WeissLaw LLP
- Williams & Skilling
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 05, 2018
Genworth, Investors Reach Deal To End Suit Over $2.7B Sale
Investors in insurer Genworth Financial Inc. on Wednesday urged a Virginia federal judge to preliminarily approve a deal resolving their proposed class action over alleged shortcomings in the company's disclosures about its planned $2.7 billion sale to a Chinese conglomerate.
-
May 31, 2017
Genworth Investor Calls Rival's Conflict Claims 'Baseless'
Two groups continued to duke it out in Virginia federal court over which Genworth Financial Inc. investors will be named lead plaintiff in a case challenging the insurer's $2.7 billion sale, with one side accusing the other on Tuesday of resorting to "fantastic arguments" about non-existent conflicts of interest.
-
May 23, 2017
Genworth Investors Say Lead Plaintiff Rival Has Conflict
Genworth Financial Inc. investors told a Virginia federal court Monday that Scott + Scott LLP and Johnson & Weaver LLP should not be named lead counsel in their case challenging the insurer's $2.7 billion sale, saying the firms' client has an incurable conflict of interest from prosecuting two related actions in Delaware court.
-
May 02, 2017
Genworth Investors Fight For Top Spot In $2.7B Merger Action
The battle continued Monday over which investors will be named lead plaintiffs in a suit in Virginia federal court challenging the $2.7 billion cash sale of insurer Genworth Financial Inc., with one side accusing the other of having a conflict of interest by prosecuting a separate derivative action on behalf of the company.
-
April 18, 2017
Genworth Investors Vie To Lead Fight Over $2.7B Merger
Investors suing insurer Genworth Financial Inc. over its planned $2.7 billion cash sale to a financial holding group owned by Chinese billionaire Lu Zhiqiang filed competing motions to be named lead plaintiffs in Virginia federal court Monday.