Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
The State of California et al v. Allergan plc et al
Case Number:
3:17-cv-00562
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 04, 2019
Calif. Inks Settlement With Endo Over Pay-For-Delay Scheme
Endo International PLC has promised to pay several hundred thousand dollars and agreed to a court order blocking the pharmaceutical company from engaging in certain business conduct in exchange for resolving claims of anticompetitive activity brought by California's attorney general.
-
February 06, 2017
Calif. AG Sues Allergan, Watson Over Pay-For-Delay Scheme
California's attorney general on Friday became the latest party to file suit over an alleged Lidoderm pain relief patch pay-for-delay scheme, accusing Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc. in California federal court of colluding with its competitors and fixing the price of the generic version of the drug.