Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
- Law360
- Law360 UK
- Law360 Pulse
- Law360 Employment Authority
- Law360 Tax Authority
- Law360 Insurance Authority
- Law360 Real Estate Authority
- Law360 Healthcare Authority
- Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
- Products
- Lexis®
- Law360 In-Depth
- Law360 Podcasts
- Rankings
- Leaderboard Analytics
- Regional Powerhouses
- Law360's MVPs
- Women in Law Report
- Law360 400
- Diversity Snapshot
- Practice Groups of the Year
- Rising Stars
- Titans of the Plaintiffs Bar
- Sections
- Adv. Search & Platform Tools
- About all sections
- Browse all sections
- Banking
- Bankruptcy
- Class Action
- Competition
- Employment
- Energy
- Expert Analysis
- Insurance
- Intellectual Property
- Product Liability
- Securities
- Beta Tools
- Track docs
- Track attorneys
- Track judges
Desoto Cab Company, Inc. v. Michael Picker, et al
Case Number:
17-15261
Court:
Nature of Suit:
-
March 13, 2018
9th Circ. Won't Revive Suit Over Calif. Ride-Hailing Reg
The Ninth Circuit won't revive a San Francisco cab company's claims the California Public Utilities Commission gave ride-hailing companies like Uber an unfair advantage when it designated them as charter services, finding Monday that the company didn't have standing to challenge the CPUC's jurisdiction.
-
February 12, 2018
9th Circ. Asked To Revive Suit Over Calif. Uber, Lyft Regs
A San Francisco cab company asked a skeptical Ninth Circuit panel to revive its allegation that the California Public Utilities Commission gave Uber and similar ride-hailing companies an unfair competitive advantage when it designated them as charter services.